Bill's Notes

[Bill, July 5, 2007]
A pass
(NOTE: Re-written)

I should note that I was initially in favor of giving Bill Clinton a pass on the whole Monica Lewinsky scandal. Later, I reversed my position, but I soon reversed myself again, and came to believe that yes, Bill Clinton should've been given a pass, just as I initially thought (and all during impeachment — my reassessment was a couple of years later).

In fact, I'm usually in favor of giving people passes and the benefit of the doubt in certain circumstances. Grace is more important than law, and to me, a pardon can be a good thing, particularly when situations are highly partisan and most likely to be motivated by political score-settling.

The pardon/commutation in largely terms is what's known as a deux ex machina — someone just friggin intervenes and that's that. It's not the most elegant solution, but sometimes, it's necessary. I was in favor of the pardon of Nixon, too. Read Moliere's Tartuffe for a good example.

So yeah, Scooter Libby should get a pass on prison, too.

I understand the charges are serious — sorta. There are two sides to every story, but what I saw was just-another-game-of-political-gotcha. I usually ignore such things, as I ignored all the Clinton scandals, because it's usually just entertainment for those who like to be perpetually outraged.

Sometimes, things get out of hand. Watergate was a little out of hand, but there's still context, and now we know that Mark Felt of the FBI sunk the Nixon presidency not so much out of idealism as revenge. If Nixon had picked Felt for FBI director, Watergate wouldn't have happened, IMHO.

It's difficult outside the beltway to get a sense of the real issues at stake — that is, the bureaucratic and political infighting that goes on in DC. Without meeting the people, it's hard to know really who they really are. All I can tell you is things are not what they seem, are rarely what they seem, unless they are ... that is to say, we out here in flyover country have a hard time determining what's going on.

Now I met Joe Wilson a couple of times as a PCV in Gabon and knew him to be someone with an unjustified confidence in his own opinion and a mammoth ego. I've also met many folks from the diplomatic corps, and they tend to have a similar sense of entitlement and similarly elephantine egos.

I could care less that Valerie Plame was outed — (by the way, it was Richard Armitage, not Scooter Libby, who outed Plame — that gets lost in the discussion). Dems simply used this to apply political pressure on the GOP/Bush through the justice system. Just like the GOP did to Clinton (which pissed me off). And just like the Dems did to Bush I and Reagan, and Nixon.

FWIW.

* Don't comment and tell me that Plame was on a critical assignment in the War on Terror. Unless you know the entire CIA strategy for her mission, and her role in it, and the redundant systems, and all that — which you don't, because you can't, don't bother. What comes out of DC is usually politically motivated factoids, devoid of context, that people use to club each other with. Plus, as I said before, Armitage outed Plame — so this isn't about that. This is about Libby's lack of candor during a grand jury investigation. Very similar to Clinton's. And since I thought Clinton should've gotten a pass, I'm not inconsistent when I say Libby should have gotten a partial pass here.


Super G (www):
Bill,

Here is a useful (counter-argument) post on whether the Libby trial is really some kind of liberal conspiracy thing.

(the rest of this can easily be classified as baiting, so read with care)

I think it is a bit unreasonable to compare the GOP's attempt to impeach a President and the Democrats rattling about Libby for political gain for a week of two. The Democrats reaction is standard politics, the impeachment went way beyond standard politics.

Still, even though I have reached a new level of personal hysteria about Bush as being a disaster, I would agree that commuting the jail time for Libby is small potatoes and really not that important. Olbermann obviously burst some kind of vessel in his brain for no reason here.

PS I know the detailed workings of all government activities include the minute details of Plame's mission and the critical nature of it in the War on Terror. Unfortunately, I can't post it in a blog comment section. If I did, I'd have to rub out everyone that happened to hit this site. So, I won't try to convince you that Plame's cover was of any value at all (though I think that level of standard seems kind of difficult for anyone to meet).
7.6.2007 2:42pm
Bill (mail) (www):
For the life of me I don't know why the GOP pursued Clinton so relentlessly and to the point of impeachment. It was a similar game of political "gotcha," in which you try to get your opponents to jump through all sorts of legal hoops during endless investigations, and then look for an opportunity to call a foul. I think it was Clinton Derangement Syndrome, and I think that when Bush was elected, it infected the Dems, who got Bush Derangement Syndrome.

I'd say that at the root of this high partisanship is the cultural war of the 1960s, but from what I've read about U.S. history, we've been at each other's throats pretty much since the day after George Washington's inauguration.

Still, even by our own American standards, Olbermann, as you said, burst a blood vessel. It was the sheer irrationality of it that got me.
7.9.2007 9:52am
Super G (www):
I don't think enough about the roots of the partisanship of today, but you are correct that is nothing new at all and the cultural changes of the 1960s clearly are deeply important.

For all of Bush's low marks with the public, the House and Senate get fewer positive comments. That should tell Democrats that too much investigating and too little action could easily be their downfall.

Thanks for the reply.

SG
7.9.2007 1:11pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?
Thank you for choosing to comment on IndustrialBlog. Our commenting policy is pretty simple: Be civil. If you are mean-spirited, tendentious, vexatious, quarrelsome and/or annoying, you just may get deleted. If you are charming, sophisticated and/or funny, on the other hand, you may get a free rein no matter what you say. It depends. Also, please note that commenting is for this post ONLY. Do not comment on other posts here. If I closed comments for a post, I did so for a reason. Thank you. Please enjoy your stay at IndustrialBlog, and remember the Blogosphere can be dangerous place -- be careful out there. The Management.