Bill's Notes

[Industrialblog, December 27, 2004]
Good writing
Is it performance or is it communication?



Chris (mail) (www):
Communication.

Performance is nothing but entertainment.
12.28.2004 3:21pm
Super G (www):
Both, unless it is a technical manual.
12.28.2004 5:57pm
mike lafferty (mail):
agreeing with super G.

pure transmission of information is math. Or, yeah, technical manuals.

If you're not doing one of those - then you have to take your audience into account -and your audience (being human) is a fickle, easily distracted animal with a short attention span and poor powers of retention. You have to pick your words to get their attention, engage them and then have exactly the desired impact.
12.29.2004 6:38pm
Chris (mail) (www):
Communication is not pure transmission of information. Communication is effectively producing ideas (whether interesting or boring) in your audience.

Performance is moving around and being interesting to look at without producing any lasting result.
12.29.2004 7:37pm
Super G (www):
Good fiction requires practice, skill, and creativity (at least for fiction). Some of the skill can be learning in writing classes, though that doesn't guarantee good writing. Since good writing encompasses a set of learned techniques, it includes an element of performance in the same way acting does. Bad writing may convey information, such as "It was a dark and stormy night," but we don't necessarily think it is good.
12.29.2004 10:23pm
mike lafferty (mail):
>Communication is not pure transmission of information.

everyone's entitled to their opinion. Webster happens to agree with mine.
12.31.2004 11:02am
Chris (mail) (www):
mike,

Are you really claiming that webster claims that communication is "the bland recital of informaiton devoid of imagry or wit", or words to that effect?

I think that good writing has a great deal of wit, but must be fundamentally communicative rather than entertaining in nature. Performance is entertainment rather than communication. Much bad writing is performance — the author having a session with his imaginary psychiatrist which he had the bad sense to write down.
1.3.2005 11:30pm