Mo Cultural Wars
Volokh links to this by Minn. Law Prof. Jim Chen [btw, Loving v. Virginia is the decision that declared anti-irracial marriages illegal]:
'Cept no one's talking about homosexual love ... we're talking about the redefinition of marriage so that it makes no sense, and then imposing that impossibility on the rest of us.
Those with same-sex attraction can already love anyone they want.
And they can already get married anywhere they want.
They just can't impose their decisions on the rest of us — that is, force us to recognize a logical impossibility.
As far as his direct channel to God, I would gently remind Prof. Chen that according to Dante, the hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who pervert reason. But it sure is cute how he got all prophetic and sanctimonious like that.
But I'm a nice guy, and I've been willing to compromise on this issue lately. Not civil unions. Not calling it "same sex marriage." Simply a change in the nomenclature. Call it "Royal Marriage." Someone is identified on the "Royal Marriage" certificate as "King" and someone as "Queen". We thus save the terms bride, groom, husband, wife and marriage from abuse.
And one last thing, about this nonsensical, incredibly racist concept that somehow homosexual sex is analogous to interracial sex ... just think about the difference between someone asking you whether you've slept with someone of another race and whether you've slept with someone of the same gender. Did that feel like the same fundamental question to you?
Let me put it perhaps more crudely from a white male perspective. If Playboy's Miss November is black with perfect C cups, you'd feel one way. If Miss November is white but has a pair of big hairy balls, you'd feel another way. Really not analogous, is it?
Do they even teach logic in college anymore?
I despair. No wonder we can't count the votes in elections anymore. We can't even figure out how to define marriage, which comes with the source code.
When this generation shall have passed from this earth, God and/or posterity will judge us as severely for our unwillingness to confess the legitimacy of homosexual love as we today judge those who resist the rightness — legal, moral, and spiritual — of Loving v. Virginia. Yesterday Massachusetts, today New Jersey, tomorrow America from sea to shining sea.
'Cept no one's talking about homosexual love ... we're talking about the redefinition of marriage so that it makes no sense, and then imposing that impossibility on the rest of us.
Those with same-sex attraction can already love anyone they want.
And they can already get married anywhere they want.
They just can't impose their decisions on the rest of us — that is, force us to recognize a logical impossibility.
As far as his direct channel to God, I would gently remind Prof. Chen that according to Dante, the hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who pervert reason. But it sure is cute how he got all prophetic and sanctimonious like that.
But I'm a nice guy, and I've been willing to compromise on this issue lately. Not civil unions. Not calling it "same sex marriage." Simply a change in the nomenclature. Call it "Royal Marriage." Someone is identified on the "Royal Marriage" certificate as "King" and someone as "Queen". We thus save the terms bride, groom, husband, wife and marriage from abuse.
And one last thing, about this nonsensical, incredibly racist concept that somehow homosexual sex is analogous to interracial sex ... just think about the difference between someone asking you whether you've slept with someone of another race and whether you've slept with someone of the same gender. Did that feel like the same fundamental question to you?
Let me put it perhaps more crudely from a white male perspective. If Playboy's Miss November is black with perfect C cups, you'd feel one way. If Miss November is white but has a pair of big hairy balls, you'd feel another way. Really not analogous, is it?
Do they even teach logic in college anymore?
I despair. No wonder we can't count the votes in elections anymore. We can't even figure out how to define marriage, which comes with the source code.
