Chris asks in the post below:
Why on earth would a chimera be the death knell for the religious perspective?
The Christian perspective is silent on animal's souls. The Buddhists ask, "Does a dog have a Buddha nature?" and the answer is the Buddha nature isn't really divisible up into things like dogs and men, or something like that. Similarly, while gorillas seem pleasant, we do not know the nature of the gorilla's soul. We do not know if he has one (I suspect yes), whether it requires salvation (I dunno) and whether or not Christ's redeeming sacrifice applies to gorillas.
Say the New York Giants grow a bunch of mostly human brains (but some gorilla brain) inside of gorillas' bodies (but perhaps modified with human genes) for an offensive line for the 2078-79 season. What is the status of such an individual before God from a Christian perspective?
Because you end up in pretty dark places, pretty quickly. Is 1/8 of a man and 7/8 of a gorilla still a man? How about 1/32? Does a human brain mean it has a human soul? If so, does that mean the brain and the soul are the same thing? If they are not humans, can we dispose of them after their usefulness has waned, such as the football players above?
You end up in a pretty materialistic perspective.
And we don't even want to get into sexuality here, especially talking about the morality of it.
Biblically based ethics are going to be one stage removed from the debate before the debate begins. And people may criticize the Bible, but "Love God with your whole heart and love your neighbor as yourself," solves gazillions of social problems, even if applied [very] imperfectly over the centuries. Without an appeal to authority for this kind of charity [not to mention internal change], societies have a difficult time replicating that morality, and abandon it in favor of tribal and pure-power politics. A chimera will just add a big monkey wrench into it.
No one is going to complain if the science is used around the edges ... I'm talking about Blade-Runner-esque nightmares.